Entries Tagged 'Personal' ↓

Gone too soon

Comet 17P/Holmes and Geminid
Image via Wikipedia

"Like a comet blazing 'cross the evening sky gone too soon...
shiny and sparkly and splendidly bright... here one day gone one night..." -- Gone Too Soon, Michael Jackson

I want to slap my face for every star that fell last night and the other night that I missed -- the Leonid, and now, the Geminid -- all gone in a day or two. My fault entirely. I knew exactly when they'll show up, I knew exactly what to do to see them but I missed the fireworks for sleep and other matters in a span of hours I couldn't even account for. Continue reading →

Popularity: 1% [?]

Getting Paid for Writing Crap (and disclosing it)

This entry is part 17 of 45 in the series The 2010 Presidential Elections

I've always wanted to write about this but for one reason or another postponed it for a more pressing issue and then another and another.

Fragile
Photo by DanielJames

A recent article about FTC issuing rules for bloggers regarding endorsements shared on Facebook and Twitter by Cocoy is a matter of significance for all bloggers right now. While it hasn't reached our shores yet, I can bet that considering how vibrant blogging is in this country, it's only a matter of time before we begin treading on egg shells. Still, if you ask me what prompted me to write this now, please blame Paul. He started it. :)

Now, this blog is obviously confusing to many. A Day In The Life Of RJ sounds like some person's online journal of everyday adventures. Why should that involve FTC?

According to the wonderful world of Wikipedia, as of 2007, Technorati was tracking around 112 million blogs, most of those categorized as personal blogs. Folks, that was two years ago. Imagine that. And these days, "online journalers" (personal bloggers) don't just write about their crushes or their impossible dreams. They don't just share what a terrible day they had in school or at work.

Personal blogs have become a mixed bag of rants (product or service dissatisfaction), raves (product or service endorsements), frustrations against the system, society, the government (political opinions) and tips on anything and everything from how they got this and that working on their gadgets to how they got to this unexplored destination (how to's, instructional content).

There is power in numbers. To underestimate the blogosphere is a mistake that is sure to cost the "doubting Thomas" an arm and a leg (figuratively, of course).

In this new FTC ruling, by December of this year, it will be compulsory to disclose whether you get anything in exchange for "reviews" on your blog -- a disclosure policy. Whether it's a free ticket to a concert or the item itself you are reviewing (gadgets, books, etc.), you would now be required by the law (at least in the US, for now) to disclose "payments" in whatever form.

But how about political bloggers? Now that is a big question. I do not see anything there that states explicitly how it approaches political blogging.

JF Quackenbush's comment in Edward Champion's interview with FTC's Richard Cleland leaves a lot of food for thought:

what’s the FTC’s statutory authority for instituting this regulation? This looks like a free press issue to me and i worry about a slippery slope about other issues beyond “product endorsements” by bloggers. Would a political activist have to disclose if they received campaign materials from a campaign they were endorsing like t-shirts or bumperstickers that could be considered compensation? Will individual bloggers have to start applying an “equal time” rule like the networks used to have for political campaigns? What are the rules for professionals who are salaried employees of an organization who in their private time endorse, promote and defend the activities of that organization on a website? What about anonymous political speech about issues affecting commerce?

This whole thing strikes me as something that somebody didn’t think through before it got out of the building.

That mentioned and considered, let us pretend for a while that I have the right to discuss political blogging ethos. Nah, forget it. Let me just say what I want to say.

A Day In The Life Of RJ is first and foremost a personal blog. It has become a political blog, not by choice but by accident when a frustrated search for lack of information about the then hotly-debated Bangsamoro Juridical Entity prompted me to do a thorough research and add my thoughts about it. I ended up writing a series -- 20 or so posts all about BJE, and the rest as they say, is history.

*****

On this blog being political

Regarding this blog being political, it is something I am neither proud nor ashamed of. It is just what it is. It has no intention of soliciting attention, or disgust or fame or whatever it is people think they get from blogging.

I have been in denial for the longest time yet the prominence of political tags and the mere fact that the political articles here have long outnumbered the personal, I have come to accept the fact that this blog has indeed steered itself to an unexpected direction and have taken a life of its own. Although it is not surprising to me, considering how highly opinionated I am of many things, politics taking the top spot, it never occurred to me that I would end up blogging politics -- hence the tag line "The accidental political blog of RJ Marmol. Try-hard punditry for non-pundits."

And for a while there, I thought writing opinions about social and political issues isn't such a big deal. After all, I can just pretend that this is still a personal blog that just happens to have a lot of political rants -- personal bloggers write politics too, albeit occasionally, so what the heck, I thought to myself.

Apparently, political blogging is a lot more ruthless than readers know and see. You get branded all sorts of stuff, you get called lots of things, simply because you dare dip your finger in a supposedly intellectually dishonest and corrupted territory -- not intended for mere mortals.

*****

I wonder why it seems natural for people to accuse political bloggers of being sell outs. After all, in politics, there's money to be had, more than enough to go around for everybody, right? They think it is utterly impossible for ploggers (political bloggers -- derived from from the word "plog" -- a contraction of the term "political blog") to be objective in "plogging".

When you get invited to coffee with politicians, everyone assumes that you get paid for it and are therefore bound to make a "positive" article -- and endorsement, if you will, about that politician. It is annoying to be accused of this, because I for one, know that I don't get paid to attend such meetings -- much less, to write compelling or adulating articles just because of a free meal or coffee.

I mean, come on, an article for a cup of coffee? Are you kidding me? They don't even pay for my fare from Calamba City to the urban jungle that is Metro Manila. I brave the overcrowded MRT station, the rain, the heat, the derision of non-believer family and friends just so I can write and scrutinize a politician personally. Heck, I don't even have adsense on my blog ! Your visit don't translate to bucks for me. Some people don't even realize that I even pay good money just to put my thoughts out there -- I pay webhosting fees, domain fees, etc.

So to the very few who think I get paid to write politics, please. Do you even have the slightest hint who I am and what my credentials are (if any)? Who would pay me to write propaganda? I am no Conrado de Quiroz ( not that I insinuate that he gets paid to write for politicos, just stressing a point that I am a nobody).

I am no "influencer" or "oppositionist writer", heck, I don't even have a job. I am no different from any other person you might bump into at a grocery aisle, except maybe for the fact that I write and I write a lot -- and that I write a lot of rants about the government. But that doesn't instantly make me an "oppositionist writer". That accusation is a flattery at best and a lie at worst.

Besides, who in his or her right mind would choose to write politics over movie and food reviews or gadgets and whatnots if not for the fact that it is his or her passion?

Argument #1: Politics is crap.
I guess we can all agree on that. The thing stinks miles away. Anyone who dare pass by where it is, is doomed to catch its stench one way or another.And boy oh boy, that stays with you long after you've gone to the shower countless times. Are we on the same boat here? Great. Now that we got that out of the way. Let's go to...

Argument #2: Nothing is filthier than getting money for writing about politics.

Yes, I am talking about real money here darling -- the kind of money that you and I know (as if there is any other). If you think politics stinks, wait until you see paid articles written about it. But these days, can you really tell?

It's frustrating, or maybe I'm just too ideal for this writing thing. After all, my entire life, I thought writers were "hungry idealists". Maybe my concept is outdated. Please pinch poke me (there you go Facebook, look what you've done to me).

But must we go to great lengths, to the point of jailing or "fining" someone who "gets paid for writing crap"? -- which brings me to..

Argument #3: Who cares if someone gets paid for writing crap?

When this or that person writes something "crappy" -- in the truest sense of the word, does that take away anything from the value or your own writings? Does that, even for a minute, rob you of your creativity and "brilliance"? Go ahead, you can pause from reading this and ponder for a few seconds, I'll wait... Done? Great. So, what do you think? Can I get a "hell, no!"?

I told you. It doesn't, my dear. People can write all the crap they can think of, get paid and buy themselves vacations to Malibu and a one way ticket to the universe's black hole  for all we care. So instead of wasting time trying to figure out who gets paid or not, what he or she gets or how much exactly, why don't we do ourselves a favor by just improving on ourselves and how we write? Brilliant idea, you say? Oh well, what can you expect, you are on a non-brilliant blog currently  engaged in two monologues -- mine and yours. Unfortunately though, two monologues don't make a dialogue.

Argument #4: If you can't really do anything about it, live with it.

This one goes out for the ones who get paid for writing political propagandas, for the idealist and purist bloggers who stick to the unwritten ethos of blogging, for those who accuse all bloggers of being sell outs, for the apathetic many and the undecided few.

But hey, that's a good idea!

On second thought, wouldn't it be great if political writers and bloggers do disclose what they get in exchange for an article (if any), specially if it's an article that's suddenly so "out of character"? That would separate the greats from the rest. If you think about it, that FTC ruling would be the purist blogger's dream come true.

Hmmm, it would be grand if I get paid for blogging politics. But sorry to disappoint you, I don't. But don't you all worry -- the moment I do get paid for writing crappy new media political propagandas, I will let you know -- with or without enforced rules. Until then, I'm just your regular purist blogger that won't even pass up for a "hungry writer".

Popularity: 1% [?]

I am a Purist Blogger

Wordpress, Technorati, GBC stickers
Photo by Titanas

I am a Purist Blogger

(a blogger's creed, by: RJ Marmol)

I am a purist blogger, I write original content.

I do not scrape from people's blogs.

I give credit where it is due, I link back "no unfollow".

I generally don't get paid to blog.

But when I do, I disclose, always.

I am a purist blogger, I do not spam.

I do not send readers to unsafe links.

I do not cram my pages with ads, but with quality content.

I am a purist blogger.

I am not after your hits, I am after your hearts.

I am not after your traffic, I am after your respect.

I do not criticize just for the heck of it.

I do not blog anonymously just so I can malign people.

When I criticize, I sign my name -- the real one.

I have accountability and responsibility for what I write.

What I write, I own.

What I own, I protect.

I am a purist blogger.

I do not deceive my readers.

When I'm selling something, I tell them.

When it's an opinion I write, I warn them.

I am a purist blogger.

I intend to contribute to the discussion, not confound it.

I intend to build  communities, not destroy them.

I write for my readers, I write for myself.

Some will read me, some won't.

Some will love me, some won't.

Some will praise me, some will attack me.

But because I'm a purist blogger, I will keep on blogging.

I will write, and blog, and write.

I am a purist blogger.

And to all the world, let it be  known,

In this vast cyberspace that is my home.

I blog assured that I am not alone.

Popularity: 1% [?]

What About Now?

This entry is part 10 of 11 in the series "The Great Flood"

The visit is done. The souvenirs scattered all over. Most people lost a lot, some everything. Some, everyone they love.

When you've lost practically everything, how do you begin?

How you start over when the very reasons for your existence and perseverance are all gone?

When your future has  now become littered with uncertainties, what is there to look forward to?

As the devastation wrought by typhoon Ondoy lay before us, we find ourselves faced with the tedious task of rebuilding -- shoveling mountainous  mud, scavenging through debris and an overwhelming pile of unrecognizable items, of what used to be known as kitchen wares, electronic appliances, books, toys and shoes.

Parallel with ongoing relief, rescue and retrieval operations, calls for disaster preparedness seminars, doing Ondoy post-mortem analysis and suggestions for preventive measures and active participation in climate change awareness is the need to rebuild communities.

We have to rebuild --in the backdrop of a gloomy atmosphere, in the absence of inspiration, in a state of shock and disbelief, under time pressure and the fear of another imminent danger.

We have to rebuild. Knowing that our lives will never be the same again, aware of the fact that this may not be the last ordeal lined up for us in this lifetime -- we have to rebuild.

Even as we feel help is too little or too late, even as we think we may have been forgotten -- we all know, we still have to rebuild.

We rebuild not because we want to. We rebuild not because we are prodded. We rebuild because we know that regardless of how hardly hit we were, regardless of how bruised and battered we may have become and regardless of how much suffering we may have endured, we know the world doesn't stop for our grief. We know that life inevitably and naturally "goes on".

So we rebuild --not because we want to, but because we have to. Because in reality, we don't really have much of a choice.

The entire citizenry, public or private, rich or poor, pessimist or optimist-- we will all have to rebuild. We will rebuild homes, roads, schools, institutions -- yes, even fractured lives.

The typhoon has left. Its winds may have taken our roofs, but not our hearts. Its raging flood waters may have swept our hard-earned belongings, but not our courage. Its wrath may have robbed us of those we love, but not of our resilience. It may have submerged entire cities, but it has not dampened our spirits.

So now, armed with faith even as small as a mustard seed, carrying flickering hope in our hearts, huddled together in this cold, ghostly towns of utter desperation, we add up each other's "mustard-seed-sized" faith and aspire to move mountains, we rekindle each other's flickering sparks of hope and aim to keep it burning, we stay close to give warmth to each other.

We are Filipinos -- descendants of heroes. Heroism -- what others can only aspire to runs through our veins.

We do not falter, we alter. We know not wane, we win. We do not retreat, we defeat.

My dear fellowmen, the challenge of rebuilding is now before us. When do we begin? What about now?

Popularity: 1% [?]

I Like Endings

contemplation

Photo by alicepopkorn ( in and out

*****

I Like Endings (by: RJ)

I like endings.

They're very kind.

They wake you up from a dream

And take you back to reality.

They make you realize that some things

Aren't meant to begin in the first place.

While endings can't undo things that you screwed-up,

It gives you another chance to start over and forget.

While endings can't mend a broken heart,

It rewards you with a clear mind

And makes you look forward to the future

Without fear or prejudice, without delusions.

I like endings.

They're indeed very kind...

****************

Loud and Clear ( The Cranberries)

I hope that you miss me

Put me down on history

I feel such a reject now

Get yourself a life

I hope that you're sorry

For not accepting me

For not adoring me

That's why I'm not your wife

People are stranger

People in danger

People are stranger

People deranged or

I remember there was

Nothing I could ever do

Never could impress you

Even if I tried

Tell somebody who cares

Fill the room with empty stares

Go to bed and say my prayers

Keep them satisfied

People are stranger

People in danger

People are stranger

People deranged

Loud and clear I make my point my dear

I hope that you never

Get the things you wanted to

Now I cast a spell on you

Complicate your life

Hope you get a puncture

Everywhere you ever drive

Hope the sun beats down on you and

Skin yourself alive ...

Loud and Clear (The Cranberries)

Popularity: 2% [?]

Withdrawal of Support to “Manny Villar for President in 2010″

This entry is part 12 of 45 in the series The 2010 Presidential Elections

Change your thinking. Change your world.

Photo credits: http://www.flickr.com/photos/herwings/ / CC BY 2.0

Withdrawal of Support to "Manny Villar for President in 2010"

A Change of Heart.

This blogger has decided to withdraw support to the presidential candidacy
of
Senator Manny Villar in 2010. As such, I'm deleting all entries that has to do with him.

Popularity: 6% [?]

Improve the web with Nofollow Reciprocity.